The Hypocrisy of Tony Pulis


October 9, 2012 by Hamilton Fan

Tony Pulis has been very vocal on the issue of diving recently.

Tony Pulis is on a one-man crusade to clean up football. Over the past couple of weeks he has made it his mission to inform the Football Association of what exactly they should be doing to eradicate the evil that is diving from the game. Firstly he accused Chelsea’s Brazilian teenage starlet Oscar and defender Branislav Ivanovic of diving in Stoke’s 1-0 defeat to the European Champions on 22nd September, branding their actions as “laughable”. Just over two weeks later Pulis was at it again, saying that Luis Suarez should be banned for three games after the striker went down, untouched, in the penalty area during the second half of their 0-0 draw at Anfield. He has a point. Diving is wrong. It is cheating, plain and simple. Is retrospective punishment the answer for serial offenders? It is up for debate, but it might be worth considering from the FA’s point of view.

Pulis’ words on diving are hard to disagree with. However, should Pulis not look at his own sides behaviour before playing the victim card? The Stoke City manager neglected to mention the horrendous stamp that his defender Robert Huth inflicted on Luis Suarez five minutes in to the match at Anfield on Sunday. Stoke are known for their physical approach and excessive (but legal) force is expected from Pulis’ side. However, this was beyond that. Huth’s stamp was violent and far beyond what should be seen on a football pitch. His remarks after Stoke’s 1-1 draw at home to Manchester City back in September after Peter Crouch handled the ball in the build-up to Stoke’s goal makes Pulis, who has took the moral highground on the diving issue, look slightly hypocritical. Pulis declared it was “brilliant” that Crouch had seemingly mananged to get away with handling the ball. If Peter Crouch deliberately handled the ball, then what is the difference between his actions and what Luis Suarez, Oscar and Branislav Ivanovic did? Cheating is cheating, whatever form it comes in.

Huth and Suarez had several battles in Sunday’s match, but the centre-back’s blatant stamp went unpunished

Suarez’s actions in the second half were not acceptable. Pulis is right to call it “an embarrassment” as that is what it is. It is inexcusable. But before he calls for an opposition player to be banned, maybe he should consider the actions of his own players first. It is not like this is the first time one of his players has been accused of taking their physical approach too far. Pulis’ hypocrisy will not win him, nor Stoke City, any sympathy when it comes to getting his point across on diving. It is time for Pulis to look closer to home before playing the moral crusader.

One thought on “The Hypocrisy of Tony Pulis

  1. You might also recall the Ryan Shawcross challenge which broke Aaron Ramsey’s leg and put him out of football for a year. Pulis the high priest of sporting morals sits uneasily with his side’s brutalist approach. Watch any La Liga game then view the Potters in action. I’ll tell him what’s ‘an embarrassment’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: